Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB71

Introduced
12/13/22  
Refer
12/28/22  
Engrossed
1/19/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Enrolled
4/19/23  

Caption

Generally revise milk control policies

Impact

The passage of SB 71 is expected to significantly impact the regulation and marketing of milk within Montana. By reinforcing state oversight, the bill intends to eliminate unfair practices within the industry that threaten the stability and quality of milk supply. Furthermore, this legislation aims to safeguard public health by ensuring milk remains uncontaminated and adequately distributed. The general emphasis on promoting fair pricing for producers through regulatory standards suggests a potential increase in economic stability for those involved in milk production and distribution.

Summary

Senate Bill 71 aims to revise Montana's state policy regarding milk price control by removing outdated policy statements and amending Section 81-23-102 of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA). The bill stresses the importance of ensuring a consistent and healthful milk supply for public consumption, highlighting the necessity of state supervision and regulation in light of the recognized challenges faced in the milk industry. It seeks to promote orderly marketing practices and eliminate trade practices that harm producers and consumers alike.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 71 appears to favor stricter regulations and oversight for the milk industry, reflecting a proactive approach to public health concerns. Proponents likely view the revisions as essential for safeguarding the welfare of both consumers and producers, aiming for a more robust and secure milk market. Conversely, there may be apprehensions from stakeholders who are concerned about increased regulation potentially complicating production and distribution practices.

Contention

The main points of contention surrounding SB 71 revolve around the implementation of comprehensive regulations that affect all aspects of milk production and marketing. Critics may raise concerns about the costs and logistical complexities of increased state supervision, particularly impacting small-scale producers. Additionally, while the bill aims to promote better health standards in milk quality, it could also be viewed as an encroachment on existing practices that some producers and distributors might find satisfactory, leading to debates about the balance between necessary regulation and operational flexibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SB202

Generally revise the Montana Local Food Choice Act

MT SB411

Generally Revise Motor Vehicle Laws

MT SB556

Generally revise workers compensation laws

MT HB128

Generally revise marijuana laws

MT SB546

Generally revise marijuana law

MT HB903

Generally revise marijuana laws

MT SB178

Generally revise cryptocurrency laws

MT HB896

Generally revise workers' compensation laws

MT HB60

Generally revise state auditor laws

Similar Bills

CA AB228

Food, beverage, and cosmetic adulterants: industrial hemp products.

CA AB841

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: Industrial Heat Electrification Roadmap.

CA AB2827

Food, beverage, and cosmetic adulterants: industrial hemp products.

CA SB1223

Construction industry: discrimination and harassment prevention policy.

CA SB787

Energy: equitable clean energy supply chains and industrial policy in California.

LA HB330

Creates the Industrial Hemp Promotion and Research Program (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

CA AB2109

Electricity: surcharge exemption: industrial process heat recovery.

WV HB401

Establishing the Certified Industrial Business Expansion Development Program