Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SJ11

Introduced
2/8/23  

Caption

Joint resolution defining law

Impact

If adopted, SJ11 would significantly alter the balance of power in Montana's legal landscape by asserting that all interpretations of law must align with the Legislature’s definition. This could impact multiple aspects of state governance, particularly in situations where judicial interpretations may differ from legislative intent. It could also lead to an increased number of conflicts between the branches, as the Supreme Court and judiciary could be limited in their capacity to provide judicial review or interpretations of laws that deviate from legislative definitions.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution No. 11 addresses a conflict between the Montana Legislature and the Supreme Court regarding the definition of law. The resolution asserts that the Legislature holds the exclusive authority to define law, explicitly stating that the Supreme Court does not possess the power to define legal statutes. This resolution positions the Legislature as the supreme authority in terms of law-making, thus raising questions about the separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches of government.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJ11 appears contentious. Supporters argue that the bill reaffirms the lawmaking authority of elected representatives, reinforcing democratic principles and legislative intent. Conversely, critics warn that this resolution could undermine the judiciary's role and jeopardize the checks and balances that are vital to maintaining judicial independence. The discourse reflects a broader debate on the interplay between legislative power and judicial authority in defining legal frameworks.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the implications for judicial review—whether the courts will still be able to function independently in interpreting laws and ensuring justice. There are fears that limiting the Supreme Court's authority could lead to a situation where legislative interpretations become overly rigid, potentially restricting judicial flexibility in addressing complex legal issues that require nuanced understanding beyond what legislative statutes may provide.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SJ15

Resolution on Marbury v. Madison

MT SJ1

Senate Joint Resolution on the joint rules

MT SJ1

Senate joint rules resolution

MT SJ8

Joint resolution on redistricting

MT HJ14

Resolution on Marbury v. Madison

MT SJ22

Joint resolution to study public transportation

MT SJ3

Joint resolution related to the Justice Counts Initiative

MT SJ18

Joint resolution recognizing MT 163rd Infantry Regiment

MT SJ9

Joint resolution establishing soil health week and day

MT SJ17

Joint resolution recognizing veterans and military service

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.