Resolution to support U.S. constitutional amendment regarding campaign finance
Impact
If passed, SR75 would reinforce existing sentiments in Montana, particularly those expressed during the passage of Initiative I-166 in 2012, where voters overwhelmingly supported limiting corporate influence in campaign finance. The resolution advocates for the perception that money should not equate to free speech, which is a central tenet challenged by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. This amendment could pave the way for future regulations at both the state and national levels, significantly altering the landscape of campaign finance laws.
Summary
Senate Resolution No. 75 (SR75) aims to urge Congress to propose a constitutional amendment that prohibits corporate campaign contributions. The resolution reflects the concerns of Montanans regarding the influence of corporate money in elections and seeks to restore what proponents view as fundamental aspects of democracy. By supporting this resolution, the Montana Senate acknowledges the detrimental effects that large corporate contributions have had on local elections and the political landscape, undermining the voice of the ordinary citizen and the integrity of the electoral process.
Contention
Discussions surrounding SR75 highlight a divide between supporters who argue for governmental regulation of campaign contributions and opponents who may view such measures as an infringement on free speech rights. The bill is situated within a broader national conversation about campaign finance reform, suggesting that while there is strong local support, there are also considerable challenges in convincing legislators at the federal level of the need for such a constitutional amendment. The resolution seeks to bring attention to these issues and mobilize support for the proposed changes.