Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB104

Introduced
12/18/24  
Refer
12/20/24  
Engrossed
1/16/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Enrolled
3/17/25  

Caption

Generally revise power and duties of agents

Impact

If passed, HB 104 will amend existing state laws found in Section 44-2-115 of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA). This amendment will enable agents appointed by the Attorney General to exercise concurrent jurisdiction alongside local law enforcement in prosecuting offenses involving human trafficking and crimes committed against children via the internet. Supporters argue that this alignment will streamline investigations and improve outcomes in cases that require specialized knowledge about internet-related crimes—areas local agencies may not be fully equipped to handle due to resource limitations.

Summary

House Bill 104 focuses on enhancing the powers and duties of agents appointed by the Attorney General in Montana. It specifically expands their jurisdiction to include serious offenses such as human trafficking, prostitution, and internet crimes against children. The bill aims to provide law enforcement with the necessary tools to investigate these offenses effectively, reflecting a growing concern about such crimes in society. By adding these categories to the list of offenses that agents can investigate, the bill seeks to strengthen the protection of vulnerable populations, particularly children, from exploitation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 104 is largely positive among legislators and advocacy groups focusing on child protection and anti-trafficking efforts. The broad support highlights a consensus on the importance of addressing these critical issues at the state level. However, there may be concerns from those who worry about the implications of expanding law enforcement powers without adequate checks and balances. Overall, the discussions suggest a prioritization of child safety and victim protection within the existing legislative framework.

Contention

Notably, while the bill aims to enhance investigative capabilities, opposition might arise from those who fear that the expanded mandate could lead to potential overreach by law enforcement. Some critics may argue that more stringent oversight is needed to protect citizens' rights against any form of invasive policing. Additionally, the operational effectiveness of this bill will largely depend on the allocation of resources to train these agents adequately for handling sensitive cases involving children and trafficking, which poses an additional point of contention in legislative discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.