Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB12

Introduced
12/11/24  
Refer
12/20/24  
Engrossed
3/19/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Enrolled
4/29/25  

Caption

Montana historic preservation grants

Impact

The passing of HB 12 is set to influence several state laws regarding the management and distribution of funds within the realm of historic preservation. It enables a structured approach to financing community initiatives aimed at preserving local heritage. Importantly, the bill sets stringent conditions for grants, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements that must be met for funding disbursement, thereby enhancing oversight and accountability.

Summary

House Bill 12, introduced by J. Fitzpatrick, is primarily focused on appropriating funds from the Historic Preservation Grant Program Account to the Department of Commerce. The bill designates a significant financial allocation of $6,229,375 for various historic preservation projects approved for the upcoming biennium beginning July 1, 2025. A detailed list of prioritized projects and their respective grant amounts is included, ranging from a $500,000 grant for the Carter County Museum to smaller allotted amounts for local community enhancements across Montana.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 12 appears to be supportive, emphasizing the importance of historical preservation within Montana. Stakeholders, including local governments and community organizations, generally view the funding as a much-needed investment in cultural heritage. While the exact discussions around the bill are not recorded in detail, the voting history indicates a favorable response, with the bill passing with 69 votes in favor and 29 against, suggesting the backing of a substantial portion of the legislature.

Contention

Despite its supportive sentiment, some concerns regarding the implementation and effectiveness of the project criteria could surface. The stipulations for grant recipients, such as documenting matching funds and maintaining compliance with financial reporting, may pose challenges. Moreover, there may be discussions surrounding which projects are prioritized and how they reflect the diverse needs of various communities across the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon