Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB347

Introduced
1/29/25  
Refer
1/30/25  

Caption

Revise laws related to hunter orange

Impact

If enacted, HB 347 would have a significant impact on existing statutes concerning hunting safety rules. By allowing the commission to establish rules regarding hunter orange attire instead of adhering to a strict mandate, the bill could promote individual discretion for hunters. This could lead to variations in safety standards across hunting contexts, depending on individual preferences and circumstances, which may affect overall hunting safety and wildlife interactions.

Summary

House Bill 347 seeks to amend current hunting regulations related to the use of hunter orange clothing. The bill provides the Fish and Wildlife Commission with explicit rulemaking authority to set forth requirements for hunter orange safety measures during hunting activities. Additionally, the bill repeals a specific previous law mandating the wearing of hunter orange while big game hunting, suggesting a potential shift towards greater flexibility in personal safety choices for hunters.

Sentiment

The discussion surrounding HB 347 reflects a divide among stakeholders. Proponents argue that repealing the rigid requirement for wearing hunter orange could empower hunters to choose safer practices that suit their specific situations, while critics contend that decreasing regulations could increase risks in the field, especially in areas with high hunting traffic. There is a shared concern about maintaining safety without imposing excessive mandates that could be seen as governmental overreach.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of repealing the existing law that requires wearing hunter orange. Supporters of the bill believe this flexibility may enhance the hunting experience, while opponents fear it might compromise safety, particularly during busy hunting seasons. The debate highlights broader themes of regulatory balance, personal choice in outdoor activities, and the responsibility of the Fish and Wildlife Commission in establishing effective safety guidelines.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.