Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB690

Introduced
2/24/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Engrossed
3/7/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Enrolled
4/18/25  

Caption

Generally revise laws related to child protection

Impact

The implications of HB 690 on state laws primarily involve the standards and definitions concerning child abuse and neglect. The revisions could potentially alter how child welfare cases are handled, especially regarding the upbringing of children in alignment with their biological sex. Additionally, the reinforcement of confidentiality laws around attorney-client privilege may impact transparency in child protection investigations, raising questions about the balance between family rights and child welfare.

Summary

House Bill 690 aims to revise child abuse and neglect laws in Montana. It clarifies certain definitions of abuse and neglect to specify that a child's upbringing consistent with their biological sex does not constitute abuse or neglect. The bill establishes that members of Congress and the Montana Legislature are prohibited from disclosing information to parents or guardians that is subject to attorney-client privilege. However, a member may challenge the department's designation of a record as privileged, enhancing scrutiny and accountability in child welfare cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 690 appears to be mixed, with supporters arguing it protects parental rights and defines clear boundaries on abuse. However, critics might view the bill as an undermining of necessary child protection measures which could shield abusive behavior under the guise of biological conformity. The discussions indicate a tension between advocating for traditional family values and the need for comprehensive child welfare reform.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions on HB 690 include the implications of defining child welfare exclusively through the lens of biological sex and the potential effects on children who may not fit traditional gender norms. This has spurred debate on whether such definitions could lead to discrimination or neglect of the unique needs of all children. The provision regarding attorney-client privilege also raises concerns over accountability and the protection of vulnerable children in cases of reported abuse and neglect.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MT SB465

Revise GAL laws and funding

MT HB37

Generally revise child abuse and neglect laws

MT SB206

Generally revise laws related to child abuse and neglect proceedings and investigations

MT HB632

Generally revise laws related to CPS investigations

MT SB464

Revise laws related to appointment of special advocates in abuse and neglect cases

MT HB399

Revise certain reporting requirements related to child sexual abuse

MT SB384

Establish temporary hardship law

NM SB307

Child Ombud Act