Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB804

Introduced
2/26/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Engrossed
3/7/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Enrolled
4/18/25  

Caption

Revise laws for lobbyist payment threshold

Impact

The enactment of HB 804 would have a significant impact on the regulation of lobbying activities within Montana. By increasing the payment threshold, the bill intends to relieve smaller lobbyists from extensive reporting requirements, thus encouraging participation from a broader range of voices in the legislative process. However, the requirement for electronic reports will promote transparency and easier access to lobbying activities for the public and lawmakers. This dual approach of easing requirements while enhancing reporting could lead to a more engaged and accountable lobbying landscape.

Summary

House Bill 804 aims to revise existing laws related to lobbying in Montana by increasing the payment threshold for lobbyists from $2,150 to $3,000. This increase is designed to adjust for inflation, ensuring that the threshold remains relevant in the context of current economic conditions. The bill also mandates that the commissioner adjusts this threshold biennially after each general election based on the changes in the consumer price index. These revisions reflect an ongoing effort to modernize lobbying laws and enhance transparency in the legislative process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 804 has generally been supportive among those advocating for regulatory reform in lobbying laws. Proponents argue that modernizing the payment threshold and incorporating electronic reporting will facilitate a more equitable environment for smaller lobbying entities. Conversely, some opponents express concerns that increasing the payment threshold could diminish accountability, allowing larger interests to dominate the lobbying landscape without thorough scrutiny. The debate reflects a balancing act between fostering a more inclusive political discourse and maintaining rigorous standards of transparency.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise mainly around the implications of raising the payment threshold. Critics argue that the increase may create barriers for transparency, potentially giving undue advantage to well-funded lobbying efforts while sidelining grassroots organizations. Additionally, discussions have focused on how future adjustments to the threshold will be calculated, with some stakeholders advocating for stricter criteria to ensure that inflation adjustments do not outpace the capacities of smaller lobbying groups. Ultimately, the passage of HB 804 could lead to significant shifts in how lobbying is conducted and regulated in Montana.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1172

Personal income tax: voluntary contributions: California Breast Cancer Research Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund and California Cancer Research Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA SB587

California Sea Otter Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

MS SB2875

Mississippi State Income Tax; phase out based on General Fund revenue collections.

MS HB212

Income tax; phase out on taxable income of individuals.

MS HB531

Mississippi Tax Freedom Act of 2022; create.

MI HB5393

Juveniles: other; default maximum time for a juvenile to complete the terms of a consent calendar case plan; increase to 6 months. Amends sec. 2f, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.2f).

MI SB0422

Courts: family division; use of screening tool for minors sought to be placed on the consent calendar; require. Amends sec. 2f, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.2f). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0418'23

MI HB4628

Courts: family division; use of screening tool for minors sought to be placed on the consent calendar; require. Amends sec. 2f, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.2f). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0418'23