Request interim study on media literacy
If adopted, HJ59 would lead to the formation of a committee tasked with exploring media literacy initiatives. This committee is charged with collaborating with various stakeholders, including state and national organizations specializing in media education, the Office of Public Instruction, and professional educator preparation programs. The outcome of this study is expected to encompass the development of a foundational understanding of media literacy, its impacts, and the current educational standards surrounding it, ultimately aiming to strengthen the curriculum in the state’s schools.
House Joint Resolution 59 (HJ59) proposes an interim study aimed at enhancing media literacy through education in the state of Montana. The resolution stems from concerns regarding the escalating use of smartphones and other screen media among children and adolescents, which has been linked to various harmful effects. By requesting an examination into how media literacy can be taught effectively, the resolution seeks to equip young people with the skills needed to navigate the evolving media landscape and mitigate potential negative impacts.
The general sentiment surrounding HJ59 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who recognize the pressing need for children to be better informed about the media they consume. Proponents argue that enhancing media literacy is crucial in an age where misinformation can spread rapidly through various platforms. Additionally, gathering insights from educators who teach media literacy is expected to yield valuable perspectives on best practices and ongoing challenges in this educational area.
There could be potential points of contention regarding the implementation of the study and the subsequent recommendations. Discussions may arise around the specifics of what constitutes 'media literacy', how to effectively assess its integration into educational curricula, and whether there may be additional requirements for teachers. Furthermore, the involvement of various organizations in the study may lead to debates over the methodologies and perspectives that are favored in curriculum development, ensuring that all voices in the education community are heard.