Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB103

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/15/25  
Engrossed
1/31/25  
Refer
2/3/25  
Enrolled
4/22/25  

Caption

Revise fee for issuing an execution or order of sale on foreclosure of lien

Impact

The bill's increase in fees directly impacts those involved in foreclosure proceedings, which may place a greater financial burden on individuals and entities seeking to enforce their liens. By increasing operational funding for district courts, the legislation may facilitate improved court efficiency and resources, thereby potentially leading to faster case resolutions. Critics argue that this increase could disproportionately affect those already struggling with financial issues related to property foreclosures, suggesting a need for more balanced measures to address the challenges posed by the foreclosure crisis.

Summary

Senate Bill 103 aims to amend Section 25-1-201 of the Montana Code Annotated by increasing the fee for issuing an execution or order of sale on a foreclosure of a lien from $5 to $25. This adjusted fee is designed to generate additional funding for the county district court fund, which could be used to enhance judicial operations at the local level. The intent of the bill is to ensure that the courts can adequately support the increasing demands for public services, especially as they relate to foreclosure cases, which have become more prevalent in recent years.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 103 appears to be mixed among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents of the bill emphasize the necessity for enhanced funding to improve court services and handle the increasing volume of foreclosure cases effectively. However, opponents raise concerns about the implications of higher fees during an already challenging economic time, suggesting that they could hinder individuals' ability to navigate the foreclosure process. Overall, the discourse indicates a tension between the need for court funding and the protection of individuals facing financial hardship.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around SB 103 include the balance between necessary funding for the judicial system and the potential hardship placed on individuals facing foreclosure. Advocates for lower fees argue that additional costs in the foreclosure process could further exacerbate the problems for homeowners in distress. Additionally, some legislators question whether there are alternative funding mechanisms that could be explored instead of simply increasing fees, leading to a broader debate on fiscal responsibility and legislative priorities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

NH HB50

Apportioning state representative districts.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

MS HB1311

Seventh Circuit Court District; revise number of assistant district attorneys and criminal investigators.