Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB365

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/21/25  
Engrossed
3/6/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Enrolled
3/31/25  

Caption

Revise siltation structure capacity at mines

Impact

If passed, SB 365 will have direct implications on state mining regulations, specifically regarding environmental safeguards and reclamation processes. By amending the rules for siltation structures, the bill aims to bolster the effectiveness of water management practices within mining operations, ensuring that they adhere to contemporary environmental standards. This could lead to more rigorous oversight by the regulatory department, which is tasked with implementing these new requirements and ensuring compliance among mining operators.

Summary

Senate Bill 365 aims to revise the capacity requirements for siltation structures at strip and underground mines in Montana. It outlines the necessary amendments to Section 82-4-231 of the Montana Code Annotated, which focuses on the operation methods for mining, including grading, backfilling, subsidence, and other environmental protective measures. The bill emphasizes the need for modern technology and advanced practices to mitigate damages from mining activities, thereby enhancing compliance with air and water quality standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 365 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Proponents argue that the revisions are essential for protecting Montana's environmental resources and adapting to modern mining challenges. However, there are concerns that increased regulatory measures might impose additional burdens on mining operators, which could affect the economic viability of certain projects. The balance between regulatory compliance and economic interests is a recurring theme in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

Notably, there are points of contention related to the bill's provisions for enforcement and the potential impacts of these regulations on existing mining operations. Some stakeholders express that the revisions could lead to higher operational costs, while others view them as essential for safeguarding public and environmental health. The debate highlights the ongoing tension between industrial interests and environmental protection, a factor that will likely shape the legislative process as the bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB626

Underground storage tanks: design and construction requirements: exemption.

TX SB2186

Relating to the Live Oak Underground Water Conservation District.

TX HB4338

Relating to the Live Oak Underground Water Conservation District.

UT HB0018

Petroleum Storage Tank Amendments

AZ SB1236

Storm water

AL HB517

Underground Damage Prevention Program, One-Call Notification System, further provided for complex or large projects

AL SB295

Underground Damage Prevention Program, One-Call Notification System, further provided for complex or large projects

MT HB633

Revise certain mine application/permit provisions