Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SJ6

Introduced
12/27/24  
Refer
1/7/25  
Engrossed
2/17/25  
Refer
2/17/25  
Enrolled
4/3/25  

Caption

Joint resolution for legislature's consent and approval long-range legislative branch capitol development plan

Impact

If enacted, SJ6 aims to implement key recommendations from the Long-Range Legislative Branch Capitol Development Plan, which identifies substantial shortcomings in the existing legislative infrastructure. The plan articulates the necessity for additional hearing rooms, workspace for elected officials, and accommodations for staff, thereby affecting operational norms within the legislative body. The anticipated changes would facilitate improved interactions among legislators and the public, ensuring a more effective legislative process.

Summary

SJ6 is a Joint Resolution introduced by Senator S. Vinton, which seeks the consent and approval of the Montana Legislature regarding the Long-Range Legislative Branch Capitol Development Plan. The bill addresses the ongoing issues related to overcrowding and limited public access in the Montana Capitol building. It builds upon findings from House Bill 856, which emphasized the need for more effective use of legislative spaces and has garnered significant support in the past legislative session. The resolution underlines current and future space needs for elected officials, support staff, and public involvement in the legislative process.

Sentiment

Reactions to the resolution have been overwhelmingly positive among legislators and advocates for improved public access to government processes. Supporters of the bill argue that investing in the legislative infrastructure is essential for sustaining a functional democracy, ensuring that citizens can actively participate in the legislative process. The sentiment indicates a recognition of the need to address historical inadequacies in the Capitol's capacity to serve both legislators and constituents.

Contention

Despite the strong support for SJ6, some discussions may arise concerning the financial implications of the proposed development. Critics could raise concerns over budget allocations and whether resources should prioritize other pressing state needs. However, the overarching concern in advocacy circles remains centered on ensuring that governmental processes are transparent and accessible, fostering a more engaged and informed citizenry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon