North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H133

Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
6/12/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  

Caption

Graham County Occupancy Tax

Impact

The enactment of HB 133 will significantly influence local revenue generation and tourism strategies within Graham County. By allowing local officials to impose a targeted occupancy tax, it opens avenues for funding initiatives aimed at enhancing tourism within the district. This aligns with wider legislative efforts to bolster regional tourism, which has been a focus for several local governments keen to expand their economic base. The bill thus provides a formal mechanism for local leaders to harness financial resources for district development without relying solely on state funding.

Summary

House Bill 133, titled the Graham County Occupancy Tax, aims to create a specific local taxing district within Graham County and grants the authority to levy an occupancy tax. This bill establishes Graham County District G, which encompasses unincorporated areas of the county, and authorizes the local governing body to impose a tax of up to 3% on gross receipts from room rentals and accommodations. The income generated from this tax is intended to support tourism promotion and related expenditures in the district, benefiting the local economy while encouraging travel and tourism activities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding H133 appears to be supportive among local authorities and tourism advocates. Proponents view the bill as a pivotal step towards empowering local government to manage and promote their tourism resources effectively. However, there could be some apprehension regarding the potential financial burden on visitors, as critics might argue that imposing additional taxes could deter tourism or make the area less attractive as a travel destination. Nonetheless, the prevailing view is that the benefits in terms of increased funding for local tourism initiatives will outweigh these concerns.

Contention

While HB 133 is primarily supportive of local governance, there are underlying tensions associated with its implementation, particularly concerning the management of tax revenue. Some stakeholders may contest how funds are allocated and whether the projected benefits to tourism will materialize as anticipated. Further, scrutiny may arise over the administrative responsibilities placed on the county's governing body regarding tax collection and distribution of resources. Ensuring transparency and accountability in the use of the tax funds will be crucial to maintain public trust and achieve the desired outcomes of the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

NH HB50

Apportioning state representative districts.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

MS HB1311

Seventh Circuit Court District; revise number of assistant district attorneys and criminal investigators.