The passage of HB 245 implies that the properties listed will no longer be subject to the city of Raleigh's municipal taxes beginning on July 1, 2023. However, liens for ad valorem taxes or special assessments that existed prior to the bill taking effect will remain valid and collectible. This means that while future revenue from these properties will no longer contribute to Raleigh’s municipal budget, any existing financial obligations tied to the properties will continue to be enforceable under the previous governance.
Summary
House Bill 245, titled 'Raleigh Deannexation', aims to remove specific described properties from the corporate limits of the City of Raleigh. The bill outlines a detailed description of the property in question, including its boundaries and marking instructions. This legislative action is significant as it directly impacts the municipal boundary and governance of Raleigh, effectively transferring property from city jurisdiction to unincorporated status. This change is set to take effect on June 30, 2023, which will alter local governance and tax obligations for the affected properties.
Sentiment
Overall sentiment around HB 245 appears to hinge on local government and property rights discussions. There may be support from property owners who desire autonomy from city regulations or taxation, reflecting a push for less municipal oversight. Conversely, local officials might express concern over the financial implications of losing these properties from the tax base, which could potentially diminish resources available for city services.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 245 include the implications of deannexation on local governance and service provision for residents within the affected areas. Questions may arise regarding zoning, enforcement of laws that were previously under the city’s control, and how this change will affect future development in that territory. The factors influencing public discourse around the bill involve balancing property owners' desires for deregulation against the city's interests in maintaining a stable tax base and local governance capacity.
Relating to the creation of the Honey Creek Improvement District No. 1; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the creation of the Honey Creek Improvement District No. 1; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the creation of the Honey Creek Improvement District No. 1; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the creation of the Honey Creek Improvement District No. 1; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments and fees.
Relating to the powers and duties of the Gunter Municipal Utility Districts Nos. 1 and 2 and to the creation of the Mustang Ranch Municipal Management District No. 1 and the Case Creek Municipal Utility District No. 1 of Grayson County; providing authority to impose a tax, levy an assessment, and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.