North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H347

Introduced
3/13/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Report Pass
3/21/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/28/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Report Pass
5/24/23  
Refer
5/24/23  
Report Pass
5/30/23  
Refer
5/30/23  
Report Pass
5/30/23  
Enrolled
6/7/23  
Chaptered
6/14/23  

Caption

Sports Wagering/Horse Racing Wagering

Impact

Upon enactment, HB 347 significantly alters the legal landscape of gambling in North Carolina by making sports wagering lawful under state law. The bill introduces a licensing system overseen by the North Carolina State Lottery Commission, which includes requirements for applicants and operators to ensure accountability and public trust. The revenue generated from sports wagering will support various state programs, including gambling addiction treatment and youth sports initiatives, potentially benefiting community health and development.

Summary

House Bill 347, also known as the Sports Wagering Act, authorizes and regulates wagering on professional, college, and amateur sports, along with horse racing in North Carolina. The bill establishes a legal framework to govern sports wagering activities, including licensing and operational procedures for interactive sports wagering operators. It aims to increase state revenue through taxes on gross wagering revenue, providing a mechanism for the State to collect and manage these funds effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 347 appears to be generally supportive among proponents who argue it will modernize the state's stance on gambling and capitalize on an emerging market to boost revenue. However, critics express concerns about the social implications of expanded gambling, including potential increases in addiction and related issues. The debate reflects a broader conversation about the balance between economic growth and the welfare of citizens.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns over the regulation of sports wagering, the integrity of the betting environment, and the potential societal impacts of legalizing such activities. Opponents worry that allowing sports wagering may lead to increased gambling addiction or exploitation, while proponents argue that a regulated environment will mitigate these risks through oversight and education. Additionally, there are discussions regarding the fairness of how tax revenues from sports wagering will be allocated and whether all communities will benefit equitably.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SC S0444

Interactive Sports Wagering

SC H3625

Interactive Sports Wagering

NC H430

Governor's Budget

NC S471

Horse Race Wagering Modifications

SC H3431

South Carolina Social Media Regulation Act

TX SB736

Relating to the regulation of sports wagering; requiring an occupational permit; authorizing a fee; imposing a tax; creating criminal offenses; decriminalizing wagering on sports events.

TX HB1942

Relating to the regulation of sports wagering; requiring occupational permits; authorizing fees; imposing a tax; decriminalizing wagering on certain sports events; creating criminal offenses; providing administrative penalties.

TX SB715

Relating to the regulation of sports wagering; requiring occupational permits; authorizing fees; imposing a tax; decriminalizing wagering on certain sports events; creating criminal offenses; providing administrative penalties.