North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H457

Introduced
3/22/23  

Caption

Union/Mecklenburg County Boundary

Impact

The bill significantly impacts local governance by transferring responsibilities and tax jurisdictions from Mecklenburg to Union County for properties that fall within the newly defined boundaries. Property owners in the affected areas will be required to pay their ad valorem taxes in Union County, aligning taxation with the property location as defined by the new boundary. Furthermore, ongoing legal matters regarding these properties will remain valid and enforceable in the appropriate adjoining county, thus maintaining continuity in governance and legal proceedings across the transition period.

Summary

House Bill 457 seeks to redefine the boundary line between Mecklenburg County and Union County in North Carolina, as per the Census Redistricting Data associated with the 2020 federal decennial census. The bill specifies that certain areas, notably the Shannamara neighborhood, will be officially part of Union County. The changes take effect on July 1, 2023, and they include provisions for the taxation of properties, voter registration, and other local governance matters affected by the boundary change, ensuring these processes are managed appropriately and transparently across the counties involved.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 457 appears to be generally supportive among local government officials who view the resurvey as a necessary step for clear governance and fair tax collection. However, there may be mixed feelings from residents who could be concerned about administrative changes, especially related to tax obligations and changes to school district assignments. Overall, local leaders emphasize the importance of effective communication and cooperation to ensure a smooth transition for affected residents.

Contention

A notable point of contention involves the handling of property taxes and legal disputes connected to the boundary changes. As properties are annexed, there could be resistance from residents worried about their tax liabilities or disputes regarding the tax assessments. There could also be issues ahead concerning the revaluation of properties post-annexation and how appeals will be managed between the two counties. The bill includes provisions to shield elected officials and employees from liability concerning these matters, yet this could lead to concerns about accountability during the transitional phase.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HCR79

Granting the State of Texas, on behalf of the Permanent School Fund, permission to sue the State of Texas and the University of Texas System.

TX SCR30

Granting permission to the State of Texas to sue The University of Texas System.

TX HCR141

Granting William James Stroman, Jr., permission to sue the State of Texas and the board of regents of The University of Texas System.

TX HCR16

Granting William James Stroman, Jr., permission to sue the State of Texas and the board of regents of The University of Texas.

TX HCR104

Urging Congress to require the Bureau of Land Management to commission a gradient boundary survey of the south bank of the Red River.

MI SB0337

Land use: other; certified survey map requirements; modify. Amends secs. 1, 2 & 3 of 1970 PA 132 (MCL 54.211 et seq.).

GA HR132

Joint Georgia-North Carolina and Georgia-Tennessee Boundary Line Commission; create

WI SB312

Programs and requirements to address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.