North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H69

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/21/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/8/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Engrossed
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
6/12/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  

Caption

Warren County Occupancy Tax

Impact

The passage of HB 69 represents a significant change in local revenue generation strategies, empowering Warren County to levy an occupancy tax for the first time. It provides a framework for the management and usage of tax revenues specifically aimed at promoting travel and tourism in the county. This bill could potentially increase tourism-related economic activities, as investments in marketing and promotional efforts are expected to draw more visitors, which in turn, can benefit local businesses and the broader economy.

Summary

House Bill 69, also known as the Warren County Occupancy Tax, allows the Warren County Board of Commissioners to impose a 5% tax on the gross receipts from rental accommodations subject to state sales tax. This bill aims to enhance funding for the county's tourism initiatives by reallocating the generated revenue towards promotional activities and other tourism-related expenditures. By establishing a designated Tourism Development Authority, the bill outlines how the collected taxes will be managed and directed towards attracting visitors and enhancing the local tourism economy.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 69 appears to be positive among local officials and tourism advocates, who view the new tax as a critical tool for expanding the county's tourism capacity and enhancing revenue streams. The support expressed during discussions reflects a collective desire to boost local tourism and economic activity; however, some residents may express concern about the additional costs incurred by visitors, which could deter some from staying in local accommodations.

Contention

Despite the overall support for HB 69, there are potential points of contention regarding the imposition of an additional tax on accommodations. Opponents may argue that the tax could create a disincentive for potential visitors or reduce competitiveness with neighboring areas that do not have such taxes. Additionally, discussions regarding the efficient use of the tax revenue and accountability of the Tourism Development Authority could be raised, particularly about how effectively the funds will translate into tangible benefits for the county.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.