North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H942

Introduced
4/30/24  
Refer
5/2/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Engrossed
5/8/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Refer
6/25/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Enrolled
6/26/24  
Chaptered
7/1/24  

Caption

SHALOM Act

Impact

By formalizing the definition of antisemitism, H942 is expected to enhance state laws concerning hate crimes and discrimination. Law enforcement agencies, educational institutions, and community organizations will have a clear guideline to refer to in their training and educational initiatives. The bill's provisions are designed to not infringe upon First Amendment rights, allowing for open dialogue while also ensuring that antisemitic actions are addressed appropriately within legal and educational contexts.

Summary

House Bill 942, known as the SHALOM Act, aims to define and combat antisemitism in North Carolina by adopting the Working Definition of Antisemitism established by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. This bill introduces a new section to Chapter 12 of the General Statutes, which provides a legal framework for recognizing and addressing antisemitic hate crimes and discrimination. It emphasizes the importance of educating the public about antisemitism and sets forth guidelines for tracking and reporting incidents related to hate against the Jewish community.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears largely supportive, focusing on the necessity of standing against hate and discrimination. Legislators and advocacy groups promoting the bill view it as a critical step toward recognizing and combating antisemitism in all its forms. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential implications for free speech, as discussions surrounding the balance between addressing hate speech and protecting First Amendment rights have surfaced.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention relates to the potential challenges in defining antisemitism and the broader context in which free speech is exercised. Some critics may argue that adopting a formal definition could unintentionally suppress legitimate discourse and criticism of Israel or Jewish practices. The bill's supporters counter that the provisions are designed to ensure protections without infringing on free speech rights, thus allowing for a balance between teaching moral principles and upholding constitutional freedoms.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.