The bill is designed to significantly alter the landscape of residential property insurance in the state. By requiring insurers to perform underwriting investigations within 90 days of the policy's effective date and limiting the instances in which claims can be denied after a policy is enacted, the bill seeks to safeguard policyholders from arbitrary or late adjustments to their premiums. This could lead to a more stable insurance system where policyholders are better informed and treated fairly, while also holding insurers accountable for their practices.
Summary
Senate Bill 134, titled 'Curb Underwriting Abuses', aims to provide protections for property and casualty policyholders in North Carolina from certain abusive underwriting practices. The bill outlines specific measures that insurers must follow regarding the underwriting process for residential properties that have no more than four housing units. These measures include timelines for underwriting investigations and restrictions on billing for additional premiums during policy renewals, thereby enhancing transparency and fairness in the insurance market.
Sentiment
General sentiment towards SB 134 appears to be supportive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups who see it as a necessary reform to protect consumers. Insurers, however, may express concerns regarding the operational adjustments and potential financial implications associated with tighter regulations. Overall, the discussions around the bill are likely focused on the balance between protecting consumers and allowing insurers the necessary flexibility to manage their risks efficiently.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding the bill could be the potential pushback from insurance companies regarding the operational burden imposed by the required timelines and restrictions on premium adjustments. Insurers may argue that such regulations can lead to increased operational costs and may limit their ability to adjust to market changes. Furthermore, ensuring sufficient regulatory oversight to enforce these provisions could be a logistical challenge, which could lead to debates on the practicality and enforceability of these statutory requirements.
Prohibits use of volunteer driving activities in underwriting for private passenger automobile insurance; revises charitable immunity statute as applied to volunteer drivers.
Permits the use of telematics by motor vehicle insurance companies to record the driving habits of insured motorists for the purpose of pricing, underwriting and customer service.