North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S367

Introduced
3/23/23  

Caption

Intercept Communications/All Parties Consent

Impact

If enacted, SB 367 would amend existing laws related to the interception of communications, making it a Class H felony to intercept communications without the consent of all parties involved. This change is significant, as it would provide a stronger legal framework to protect the privacy of individuals and deter unauthorized interception activities. The bill is slated to take effect on December 1, 2023, and would apply to offenses committed on or after that date, indicating a proactive approach towards addressing privacy concerns moving forward.

Summary

Senate Bill 367 aims to prohibit the interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications without the consent of all parties involved. This bill seeks to enhance privacy protections for individuals by ensuring that communication cannot be monitored or disclosed without consent. The legislation aligns with a growing concern about the rights of individuals to maintain confidentiality in their communications, particularly in an age where technology allows for easy interception and monitoring of conversations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 367 appears largely supportive among privacy advocates who view it as a necessary step to bolster individual rights. Legislators sponsoring the bill promote it as a way to enhance legal safeguards against unauthorized monitoring. However, concerns have been raised about how this legislation may affect law enforcement's ability to conduct investigations, as the requirement for all-party consent could complicate certain operational procedures, potentially leading to a debate on balancing privacy rights with public safety needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential implications for law enforcement agencies and their communication interception methods. Critics may argue that requiring consent from all parties could hinder investigations into criminal activities, where timely interception of communications is crucial. Additionally, the classification of violations under the proposed law and its implications for various sectors, including emergency services and public safety communication systems, are expected to be scrutinized during discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA SB710

Provides relative to the interception of communications. (8/1/12)

HI SB284

Relating To Interception Of Wire, Oral, Or Electronic Communication.

CA SB439

Criminal procedure: wiretapping: authorization and disclosure.

AL SB26

Drug trafficking, wiretapping by ALEA, interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications, Attorney General authorized to apply for court order for intercept and to apply for intercept orders, disclosure of recorded communications, penalties for violations, Secs. 20-2A-1 to 20-2A-15, inclusive, added

AL HB17

Drug trafficking, wiretapping by ALEA, interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications, Attorney General authorized to apply for court order for intercept and to apply for intercept orders, disclosure of recorded communications, penalties for violations, Secs. 20-2A-1 to 20-2A-15, inclusive, added

VA SB531

Communications; application for and issuance of order authorizing interception.

KY HB725

AN ACT relating to crimes and punishments.

LA SB105

Provides a monetary penalty for the introduction of contraband into a correctional facility by a visitor. (8/1/12) (REF INCREASE SG RV See Note)