North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S762

Introduced
2/14/24  

Caption

Modify State Board of Elections Authority

Impact

The bill impacts state election laws by formalizing the manner in which challenges to candidates can be filed, specifically focusing on the qualifications required for elective office. By codifying these requirements and the process for challenges, the bill aims to ensure clarity and efficiency within election procedures. This could potentially influence the number and type of eligibility challenges put forth by voters, as it establishes a formal procedure that must be adhered to.

Summary

Senate Bill 762 seeks to modify the authority of the State Board of Elections regarding the handling of candidacy challenges. The proposed changes include outlining the timeframe and procedure for filing challenges to candidates, emphasizing that challenges must be made through a verified affidavit base on reasonable suspicion. This adjustment seeks to streamline the process by which voters can contest the qualifications of candidates running for office in North Carolina.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB 762 remains cautious, with advocates arguing that it is a necessary step to protect the integrity of elections by enabling voters to hold candidates accountable to the established qualifications. However, opponents warn that the changes could lead to frivolous challenges being pursued, which may burden the election process and discourage participation by legitimate candidates.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from concerns that the new regulations could have the unintended effect of making it more challenging for candidates, especially those from underrepresented groups, to navigate the election process. Critics emphasize the importance of balancing the need for robust election integrity measures with the potential risks of disenfranchising qualified candidates. As the bill moves forward, discussions around these implications are likely to remain a focal point.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC S107

Judge Joe John Nonpartisan Jud. Elections Act

NC H129

Judge Joe John Nonpartisan Jud. Elections Act

NC H68

Reenact Nonpartisan Judicial Elections/Fund

NC H706

Electioneering/SEI Filing/Voter Photos

NC S749

No Partisan Advantage in Elections

NC S747

Elections Law Changes

NC H66

Boards of Education Elections

NC H580

SBOE Legislative Changes.-AB

NC S306

Fix Our Democracy

NC H362

Fix Our Democracy

Similar Bills

CA SB1133

Peremptory challenges.

CA AB3070

Juries: peremptory challenges.

CA SB212

Prospective jurors for criminal trials: peremptory challenges: elimination.

MI SB1068

Elections: challengers; requirements and procedures for election challengers; modify, clarify challenges to voter registration, and clarify the procedure regarding certain absent voter ballots. Amends secs. 509r, 509aa, 509bb, 509cc, 512, 523b, 727, 728, 730, 731, 733, 765a & 769 of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.509r et seq.); adds secs. 726c, 726d & 726e & repeals secs. 729 & 732 of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.729 & 168.732).

NJ A3880

Modifies challenger credentialing process for early voting period.

CA SB645

Juries: peremptory challenges.

CA SB758

Juries: peremptory challenges.

CA AB3039

Juries: peremptory challenges.