North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H135

Introduced
2/17/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  

Caption

Misbranding/Cell-Cultured Meat/WNC Donations

Impact

By implementing these labeling requirements effective from October 1, 2025, the bill aims to clarify the distinction between traditional meat products and those derived from cell cultures. Additionally, the prohibition against community colleges, public universities, and schools purchasing cell-cultured products reflects a protective measure aimed at local agricultural interests and the perception of food quality among students. The bill allows local educational institutions to exercise more control over the types of food products they make available to students, potentially shielding them from what some may view as 'misbranded' goods.

Summary

House Bill 135, titled 'Misbranding/Cell-Cultured Meat/WNC Donations', seeks to establish specific labeling requirements for cell-cultured food products and prohibit public educational institutions from purchasing these products. The bill defines 'cell-cultured food product' and stipulates that any product identified as such must include disclaimers in a prominent font on its packaging. This measure is geared towards ensuring that consumers are adequately informed about the nature of the food they are purchasing and potentially mitigate confusion regarding its origins compared to conventional meat products.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 135 appears to be supportive among agricultural advocates who believe clear labeling will protect consumer interests and sustain traditional farming practices. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential backlash against innovation in food production, as cell-cultured meat technologies become more prevalent. Some see the bill as restrictive and a hindrance to market growth in the face of evolving food technologies. The polarized sentiment indicates substantial public interest in the discussion of food source transparency.

Contention

Notably contentious elements within the discussions around HB 135 include the impact of prohibiting the purchase of cell-cultured foods in educational institutions and the implications for future food production methods. Critics argue that such limitations could stifle advancements in food technology and innovations designed to address food security. The establishment of the Western North Carolina Farm Relief Fund, meant to assist farms affected by Hurricane Helene, introduces an additional layer of complexity to the bill, as funds will be available to support localized agricultural recovery, balancing innovation with historical agricultural practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SC H4505

W.R. “Cody� Simpson III

SC H4384

Farm Export Relief and Resilience Act

NC S355

North Carolina Farm Act of 2024

NC H539

North Carolina Farmers Appreciation Day

NC S891

HBCU/HMSI Omnibus

SC H3279

SC Equine Promotion Act

NC S574

Soil Health Task Force

NC S582

North Carolina Farm Act of 2023