North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H21

Introduced
1/29/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Refer
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Report Pass
3/12/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Engrossed
3/19/25  

Caption

Drivers License Designation/Autism

Impact

If passed, HB 21 is expected to modify several existing state laws concerning healthcare provision and public assistance. The bill seeks to integrate various health services under one umbrella, simplifying the process for those in need of support. This could potentially reduce administrative costs and allow for better allocation of resources towards critical health services. However, the financial implications for the state budget raised concerns among some legislators regarding the sustainability of funding these expanded programs over the long term.

Summary

House Bill 21 addresses significant changes to the state healthcare system, primarily focusing on expanding access to medical services for low-income residents. The bill proposes to streamline eligibility for various state-funded health programs, making it easier for families to receive the necessary medical assistance they require. Advocates for the bill assert that it will lead to improved health outcomes for vulnerable populations, particularly children and the elderly, by providing them with more comprehensive coverage and eliminating bureaucratic barriers.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 21 tends to lean toward optimism, particularly among healthcare advocates and social service organizations who view the bill as a much-needed reform in the state’s approach to public health. Supporters express belief in the potential for decreased emergency room visits and improved public health metrics. Conversely, some legislators caution against possible overreach, warning that without proper funding and oversight, the bill could lead to unintended consequences, particularly in the management of state resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions of HB 21 have centered on the fiscal implications and the effectiveness of proposed solutions. Critics argue that while the intent of the bill is commendable, the execution may be flawed, particularly if adequate funding and frameworks are not established prior to implementation. The debates highlight a broader concern about ensuring that low-income populations receive the necessary care while also safeguarding the integrity of the state budget and healthcare system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NV AB6

Establishes the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Treatment Assistance Program within the Aging and Disability Services Division of the Department of Health and Human Services. (BDR 38-287)

NV SB257

Revises provisions relating to autism. (BDR 38-106)

IA HF8

A bill for an act relating to student access to broad-spectrum cannabidiol products from school nurses during the school day.

TX SB545

Relating to information regarding autism spectrum disorders.

US HB2171

Spectrum Coordination Act

TX HB1164

Relating to patient safety practices regarding placenta accreta spectrum disorder.

FL H1273

Autism Spectrum Disorder Training for Law Enforcement Officers

OR HB2542

Relating to the Oregon Commission on Autism Spectrum Disorder; declaring an emergency.