North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H298

Introduced
3/5/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/10/25  

Caption

Local Gov'ts/System Development Fees

Impact

If enacted, H298 would fundamentally alter how local municipalities handle system development fees, which are essential for funding services and facilities in response to new development. The bill specifically enables installment payments spread over three years or less, thereby reducing the immediate financial burden on developers and potentially stimulating economic growth. However, this also raises concerns about the timely funding of infrastructure projects, as municipalities might encounter cash flow issues while awaiting full payments.

Summary

House Bill 298, also known as the Local Gov'ts/System Development Fees bill, aims to modify the collection process of system development fees for nonresidential new developments in North Carolina. The bill proposes that for new developments with a calculated increased flow rate between 325 and 2,500 gallons per day, local governmental units may allow these fees to be paid in installments. This change seeks to provide more flexible financial options for developers, promoting the construction of nonresidential buildings while ensuring local governments can still fund necessary infrastructure improvements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears generally positive among developers and business advocates who view the flexibility of installment payments as a significant boon for encouraging new construction. However, there may be apprehension from local government officials regarding the implications for municipal funding mechanisms and long-term infrastructure planning. The balance between fostering development and ensuring robust funding for local services is a critical point of discourse among stakeholders.

Contention

Notably, the primary contention regarding H298 revolves around the impact on local government revenue streams. Critics may argue that allowing payment in installments could lead to delays in funding for infrastructure that is directly linked to new developments, raising concerns about whether local governments would be able to keep up with the demand for services as new projects are brought online. The success of this bill may hinge on the ability to negotiate a sustainable approach to balancing development incentives with necessary infrastructure funding.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.