North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H746

Introduced
4/2/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/6/25  

Caption

Limited Immunity/Nurses

Impact

The passage of HB 746 is likely to have significant ramifications in the healthcare sector within North Carolina. By establishing a legal framework for limited immunity, the bill seeks to create a safer working environment for nurses, encouraging them to perform their duties without the constant concern of litigation. Proponents argue that this will improve overall patient care, as nurses will be more willing to voice concerns about orders that could endanger patients' safety. The bill seeks to promote a culture of collaboration and safety within healthcare teams, which can lead to better health outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 746 proposes to provide limited immunity against medical malpractice for registered nurses acting under the supervision of a healthcare provider. This comes in response to a recent legal change that overturned long-standing case law established by Byrd v. Marion General Hospital, which had previously protected nurses from liability while acting under a physician's orders. The bill aims to restore this protection by allowing nurses to operate without the fear of malpractice claims, provided they act within their scope of practice and adhere to the guidelines set forth by their supervising healthcare provider. The bill is set to take effect on October 1, 2025, for actions occurring after that date.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 746 appears to be largely supportive among nursing and healthcare association members, who view it as a necessary legislative step toward protecting nurses and enhancing patient care. However, there may also be voices of caution regarding the potential effects of limited immunity, particularly in cases of gross negligence or misconduct. Critics could argue that the bill might inadvertently enable malpractice by reducing the accountability of healthcare professionals. Nonetheless, the bill's supporters maintain that it strikes a balance between accountability and effective patient care.

Contention

The notable point of contention revolves around the implications of limiting liability for nurses and how that could affect overall patient safety. Supporters believe that giving nurses this immunity will enable them to act in the best interest of their patients without the looming threat of malpractice lawsuits, while opponents may raise concerns about the potential for negligent behavior to go unpunished. Additionally, the distinction between actions taken in good faith versus those deemed to be grossly negligent may become a focal point for future legal interpretations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.