Require Licensure of Educational Interpreters
The passage of HB 854 will mean that educational interpreters and transliterators must fulfill certain qualifications and maintain licensure through continuing education and assessment. This is expected to ensure that these professionals are sufficiently trained and qualified to meet the needs of hearing-impaired students, therefore improving educational access and communication within the classroom. It may also introduce a regulatory framework that can uphold standards of practice, thereby potentially raising the overall quality of interpreted education in North Carolina.
House Bill 854 seeks to amend the North Carolina Interpreter and Transliterator Licensure Act by removing the exemption of educational interpreters and transliterators from licensure requirements. The bill mandates that, moving forward, individuals providing interpreting services to students in educational settings must obtain a license from the North Carolina Interpreter and Transliterator Licensing Board. This change aims to enhance the quality of interpreting services available to hearing-impaired students from prekindergarten through grade 12 and in higher education institutions.
The sentiment around HB 854 appears to be supportive among advocates for the hearing-impaired and educational professionals who recognize the importance of qualified interpreters in educational settings. However, there may be some apprehension from current educational interpreters who may need to adapt to new licensing requirements and prepare for potential costs associated with obtaining and maintaining their licenses.
A notable point of contention surrounding HB 854 could include concerns about the implications for currently exempt interpreters who may not be prepared to meet new licensure standards. There could also be discussions about the adequacy of the proposed training programs and assessments for ensuring that interpreters are truly qualified to serve the needs of diverse student populations. Additionally, the financial burden of obtaining a license and ongoing training may raise concerns among current practitioners and their employers.