12 | 13 | | A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1 |
---|
13 | 14 | | AN ACT TO REVISE THE STUDENTS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY 2 |
---|
14 | 15 | | ALLOTMENT, TO REQUIRE THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION TO STUDY THE 3 |
---|
15 | 16 | | STUDENTS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ALLOTMENT, AND TO 4 |
---|
16 | 17 | | APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO THE STUDENTS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH 5 |
---|
17 | 18 | | PROFICIENCY ALLOTMENT. 6 |
---|
18 | 19 | | The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 7 |
---|
19 | 20 | | SECTION 1.(a) For the 2025-2027 fiscal biennium, the State Board of Education 8 |
---|
20 | 21 | | shall develop guidelines for identifying and providing services to students with limited 9 |
---|
21 | 22 | | proficiency in the English language, as follows: 10 |
---|
22 | 23 | | (1) The State Board of Education shall allocate these funds to local school 11 |
---|
23 | 24 | | administrative units and to charter schools under a formula that takes into 12 |
---|
24 | 25 | | account the average percentage of students in the units or the charters over the 13 |
---|
25 | 26 | | past three years who have limited English proficiency. The State Board of 14 |
---|
26 | 27 | | Education shall allocate funds to a unit or a charter school only if (i) average 15 |
---|
27 | 28 | | daily membership of the unit or the charter school includes at least 20 students 16 |
---|
28 | 29 | | with limited English proficiency or (ii) students with limited English 17 |
---|
29 | 30 | | proficiency comprise at least two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the average 18 |
---|
30 | 31 | | daily membership of the unit or charter school. For the portion of the funds 19 |
---|
31 | 32 | | that is allocated on the basis of the number of identified students, the State 20 |
---|
32 | 33 | | Board of Education shall not set a maximum number or percentage of 21 |
---|
33 | 34 | | identified students for whom a unit or charter school may receive funds. 22 |
---|
34 | 35 | | (2) Local school administrative units shall use funds allocated to them to pay for 23 |
---|
35 | 36 | | classroom teachers, teacher assistants, tutors, textbooks, classroom 24 |
---|
36 | 37 | | materials/instructional supplies/equipment, transportation costs, and staff 25 |
---|
37 | 38 | | development of teachers for students with limited English proficiency. 26 |
---|
38 | 39 | | (3) A county in which a local school administrative unit receives funds under this 27 |
---|
39 | 40 | | section shall use the funds to supplement local current expense funds and shall 28 |
---|
40 | 41 | | not supplant local current expense funds. 29 |
---|
41 | 42 | | SECTION 1.(b) The Department of Public Instruction shall prepare a current head 30 |
---|
42 | 43 | | count of the number of students classified with limited English proficiency by December 1 of 31 |
---|
43 | 44 | | each year. Students in the head count shall be assessed at least once every three years to determine 32 |
---|
44 | 45 | | their level of English proficiency. 33 |
---|
45 | 46 | | SECTION 2. The State Board of Education shall study the allotment for students 34 |
---|
46 | 47 | | with limited English proficiency (LEP), as enacted by Section 1 of this act. No later than 35 |
---|
49 | 54 | | Legislative Education Oversight Committee and the Fiscal Research Division. The report shall 1 |
---|
50 | 55 | | include, at a minimum, the following information: 2 |
---|
51 | 56 | | (1) Whether the current LEP allotment is aligned with resources needed to ensure 3 |
---|
52 | 57 | | that students with limited English proficiency have the opportunity to become 4 |
---|
53 | 58 | | proficient in English. 5 |
---|
54 | 59 | | (2) A recommended funding factor to be included in the LEP allotment to account 6 |
---|
55 | 60 | | for the number of languages spoken by students in local school administrative 7 |
---|
56 | 61 | | units and charter schools. 8 |
---|
57 | 62 | | (3) A recommended plan to foster more bilingual education programs in the State. 9 |
---|
58 | 63 | | (4) Recommended funding models, with associated costs, to eliminate any 10 |
---|
59 | 64 | | achievement gap between students who are proficient in English and students 11 |
---|
60 | 65 | | with limited English proficiency. 12 |
---|
61 | 66 | | (5) An analysis of the effects of eliminating in the LEP allotment any 13 |
---|
62 | 67 | | consideration of (i) the concentration of students with limited English 14 |
---|
63 | 68 | | proficiency and (ii) a minimum eligibility threshold. The analysis should 15 |
---|
64 | 69 | | include whether to eliminate any or all of these components of the LEP 16 |
---|
65 | 70 | | allotment and proposed alternative metrics for allotting these funds. 17 |
---|
66 | 71 | | SECTION 3. There is appropriated from the General Fund to the Department of 18 |
---|
67 | 72 | | Public Instruction the sum of sixteen million two hundred thousand dollars ($16,200,000) in 19 |
---|
68 | 73 | | recurring funds for the 2025-2026 fiscal year to increase the students with limited English 20 |
---|
69 | 74 | | proficiency allotment. 21 |
---|
70 | 75 | | SECTION 4. This act becomes effective July 1, 2025. 22 |
---|