The enforcement and penalties of communities that fail to adopt or enforce floodplain management ordinances as required under the national flood insurance program.
Impact
If enacted, HB 1098 would withhold flood disaster assistance, whether financial or otherwise, from communities that do not adhere to the required floodplain management regulations. This creates a significant impetus for communities to adopt and enforce relevant ordinances, highlighting the crucial link between compliance and state aid for flood relief. It emphasizes the state's commitment to aligning local practices with federal guidelines in the domain of flood management, thereby enhancing overall disaster preparedness across the region.
Summary
House Bill 1098 addresses the enforcement and penalties associated with communities that fail to adopt or enforce floodplain management ordinances as required under the national flood insurance program. The bill amends existing provisions within the North Dakota Century Code, specifically targeting how communities handle floodplain management to ensure compliance with federal regulations. It underscores the importance of local governance in managing flood risks, reflecting a proactive stance in safeguarding both property and lives from flood-related disasters.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1098 appears to be largely supportive, with bipartisan backing reflected in the voting history—indicating a consensus on the importance of flood preparedness. The passage of the bill with overwhelming favor (House Vote: Yeas 91 Nays 1; Senate Vote: Yeas 45 Nays 0) suggests that legislators recognize the critical nature of flood management and the necessity for communities to take preventive actions. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the implications of state-mandated regulations on local governance and resources.
Contention
Despite its broad support, some contention may arise concerning the penalties for non-compliance, particularly regarding the accessibility of state-funded disaster assistance. Critics may argue that withholding aid imposes an undue burden on communities, especially those with limited resources or capacity to effectively implement required ordinances. Additionally, discussions may emerge about the balance between state versus local control, especially in tailoring flood management solutions that address specific community needs and circumstances.
Law enforcement, to prohibit a law enforcement officer from using an restraint that restricts blood flow to the neck or head, penalties, require law enforcement agencies to adopt anti four-point restraint policies