Prohibiting a forced or coerced abortion; and to provide a penalty.
Impact
If enacted, HB 1171 will create a class C felony offense for those found guilty of forcing or coercing a woman into having an abortion. This legal framework intends to enhance the safety and rights of women in North Dakota concerning reproductive health. The bill provisions also mandate that victims of such coercion be informed of investigations involving their case, which could foster greater trust in law enforcement handles related to reproductive rights. As a result, the bill represents a significant shift in how cases of reproductive coercion will be treated legally within the state.
Summary
House Bill 1171 aims to address the issue of forced or coerced abortions in North Dakota by prohibiting such acts and establishing legal penalties for violators. The bill defines forced or coerced abortion as any scenario where physical harm or threats are used to compel a woman to undergo an abortion against her will. Additionally, the bill specifies what constitutes an abortion and outlines exceptions, including circumstances related to ectopic pregnancies or the health of the unborn child. The aim of this legislation is to protect women's autonomy over their reproductive choices and ensure that they are not subjected to coercion.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 1171 appears largely supportive among legislators who view it as a necessary measure to safeguard women's rights. Observers have noted a strong bipartisan agreement on the need to prevent coercion in reproductive choices. However, there are notable discussions within civil rights groups and some lawmakers who express concerns regarding the potential implications of the bill on reproductive freedoms, emphasizing the importance of nuanced discussions and awareness regarding women's health rights.
Contention
While the bill garnered substantial support and passed with minimal opposition, some points of contention revolve around the implications of redefining abortion laws in North Dakota. Opponents include those worried that the bill does not take into account broader reproductive health issues and the right to an abortion. Critics argue that while addressing coercion is essential, there may be broader impacts on women's reproductive rights that need more thorough consideration. They emphasize that protecting women from coercion should coincide with preserving access to safe and legal abortion services.
Abortions, sex-selective abortions, genetic abnormality abortions, human dismemberment abortions, and abortions after a detectable heartbeat; to provide a penalty; and to declare an emergency.
Crimes: penalties; penalties for partial-birth abortion and coercion to have abortion; increase. Amends secs. 90h & 213a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.90h & 750.213a).