North Dakota House Bill HB1184

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23
• Report DNP: 2/9/23

Caption

A BILL for an Act to provide an appropriation to the attorney general for a peace officer and correctional officers appreciation grant program.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1184 would result in state funds being allocated specifically for the appreciation of peace officers and correctional officers. This funding could potentially include support for programs or initiatives that directly benefit these officers or enhance their work environment. The bill's proponents argue that such appropriations could lead to improved job satisfaction, a reduction in turnover, and better recruitment efforts in law enforcement agencies across the state. This legislation thus aims to contribute positively to the retention and well-being of these essential workers.

Summary

House Bill 1184 seeks to appropriate funds to the attorney general's office for a program that provides appreciation grants to peace officers and correctional officers. The intent of the bill is to recognize and support those who serve in law enforcement and correctional facilities, acknowledging the challenges and risks associated with these professions. By facilitating such grants, the bill aims to enhance morale and show appreciation for the critical work performed by these individuals in maintaining public safety and order.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1184 appears to be positive among lawmakers and advocacy groups supporting law enforcement. Proponents view the bill as a necessary recognition of the sacrifices made by peace officers and correctional officers. However, the extent of support may vary based on political alignment and views surrounding law enforcement funding. In contrast, some critics might express concerns about prioritizing funding for law enforcement at the expense of other critical public services.

Contention

Notably, the bill faced a vote on February 14, 2023, where it garnered 28 yeas but was ultimately met with opposition, receiving 63 nays. This division highlights a significant contention point regarding how state resources should be allocated when considering funding for law enforcement versus other community needs. Discussions around the bill may touch on broader themes of public safety, funding priorities, and the public perception of law enforcement agencies, indicating a complex legislative landscape.