North Dakota House Bill HB1497

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/23
• Refer: 1/18/23
• Report Pass: 2/15/23
• Engrossed: 2/17/23
• Refer: 2/20/23
• Report Pass: 3/29/23

Caption

The maximum number of gaming sites allowed and the maximum number of electronic pull tab devices allowed at a site; and to provide for a legislative management study .

Impact

If enacted, HB 1497 would trigger a formal study that examines the current state of charitable gaming, assessing whether existing regulations support its fair operation and accessibility. The bill calls for assessing the effectiveness of the enforcement of gaming laws, including taxation and the use of proceeds, ensuring that small charities benefit adequately from gaming activities. This could lead to potential changes in regulations governing charitable gaming and the allocation of resources toward addiction prevention services.

Summary

House Bill 1497 proposes a legislative management study of the state's charitable gaming industry. The bill aims to evaluate various aspects of charitable gaming in North Dakota, including its expansion, accessibility for small charities, gambling addiction prevention and treatment services, and the adequacy of current gaming laws and taxation. The study is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of how charitable gaming operates within the state, highlighting areas that may require legislative attention or reform.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1497 appears to be one of cautious approval from some legislators who recognize the need for a thorough review of charitable gaming practices. Supporters argue that the study could reveal critical insights necessary to improve the framework of charitable gaming in the state, ultimately benefiting both charities and the communities they serve. However, there may be contention regarding how potential findings and recommendations would be implemented in practical terms.

Contention

Notably, the discussion surrounding HB 1497 may involve differing opinions on the extent to which charitable gaming should be regulated or supported. While the bill intends to promote transparency and accessibility, questions may arise about the impact of such regulations on the charities involved and the gambling industry as a whole. There could be debates about whether the state should focus more on income derived from gaming activities or on the welfare of communities impacted by gambling.