North Dakota House Bill HB1506

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/23
• Refer: 1/18/23
• Report Pass: 2/7/23
• Engrossed: 2/13/23
• Refer: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 3/24/23
• Enrolled: 4/5/23
• Passed: 4/10/23

Caption

A bicycle and a ridden animal being deemed a vehicle; and to provide a penalty.

Impact

The bill's enactment alters existing traffic laws by explicitly including bicycles and ridden animals under the definition of a vehicle, which has implications for both law enforcement and public safety. The penalty for those caught under the influence while biking or riding is set at two hundred dollars, creating a new financial deterrent against operating these modes of transport while impaired. This change aims to enhance public safety on roadways and other public access areas, which could lead to more responsible behaviors among cyclists and animal riders.

Summary

House Bill 1506 establishes new provisions regarding the operation of bicycles and the riding of animals while under the influence of alcohol or drugs in North Dakota. The bill enacts a new section of the North Dakota Century Code that deems bicycles and ridden animals as vehicles, thereby subjecting their operators to the same regulations and penalties applicable to motor vehicle operators. A specific penalty is set for individuals found to be operating a bicycle or riding an animal while impaired to a degree that poses a hazard to themselves or the public.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1506 appears to be fairly supportive among the legislative members, as indicated by the voting results—85 votes in favor and only 6 against during the House Second reading. Discussions surrounding the bill indicate a common understanding of the need for heightened safety measures regarding impaired operation, and there seems to be a recognition of the growing popularity of bicycles and animal riding in public spaces as a valid concern.

Contention

While the bill has generally received positive reception, there are potential points of contention regarding the enforcement of the new regulations. Critics may argue that distinguishing between responsible and irresponsible behaviors in such cases could be challenging for law enforcement, raising concerns about the practical application of the law. Additionally, defining the threshold of impairment for bicycles and animal riders may lead to debates about fairness and the appropriateness of the penalty compared to those for motor vehicle operators.