The subject matter of initiated measures and constitutional amendments, the manner of signing petitions, the establishment of an electronic signature gathering system by the secretary of state, and the threshold for placing a measure on the ballot; to provide for application; and to provide an effective date.
The bill seeks to have a significant impact on how initiated measures and constitutional amendments are processed in North Dakota. By requiring petitions to only comprise a single subject and implementing an electronic system for signature gathering, the bill aims to reduce clutter and confusion in the petition process, potentially increasing the efficiency with which measures can be brought to voters. Additionally, the amendment adjusts the thresholds for submitting petitions, requiring a percentage of the state’s population that reflects more current population data, which could influence the frequency and types of measures appearing on the ballot in future elections.
HCR3031 is a concurrent resolution that proposes amendments to the North Dakota Constitution, focusing on the process for initiated measures and constitutional amendments. Key changes include the establishment of an electronic signature gathering system by the secretary of state, stipulating that petitions for initiated measures can only include one subject, and modifying the thresholds for placing such measures on the ballot based on the state's population as determined by the latest federal census. The proposed amendments aim to streamline and simplify the processes around initiating measures and gathering signatures, adapting to modern technological standards.
The sentiment surrounding HCR3031 appears to be mixed. Supporters of the bill advocate for updating the signature process to make it more accessible and streamlined, potentially increasing public engagement with the electoral process. However, opponents might express concerns about the complications that arise from the introduction of an electronic system, questioning its reliability and accessibility for all potential petitioners. The broader implications on democratic participation and local governance are also points of contention, as critics may worry that limiting the subjects of measures oversimplifies important issues that might require a more comprehensive address.
One notable point of contention during discussions of HCR3031 is the balancing act between maintaining the integrity and thoroughness of the legislative process while modernizing it. While proponents argue that these changes will facilitate a more efficient way of gathering and validating signatures, detractors may raise concerns about the potential for disenfranchisement, particularly among those who may not have access to the necessary technology for electronic signatures. Furthermore, the stipulation that measures must only address one subject could lead to challenges when complex social issues need to be addressed comprehensively.