North Dakota Senate Bill SB2115

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/3/23
• Refer: 1/3/23
• Report Pass: 2/20/23
• Engrossed: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Refer: 3/3/23
• Report Pass: 3/21/23
• Enrolled: 3/24/23
• Passed: 3/30/23

Caption

Licensing and discipline of physicians and physician assistants.

Impact

The changes proposed by SB 2115 significantly impact professional practices in North Dakota by increasing oversight on the standards required for medical licenses. This includes updated procedures for handling disciplinary actions against licensees and clearer definitions for the practice of medicine and residency licensure. The legislation aims to streamline the processes by which complaints against physicians and physician assistants are investigated and managed, potentially leading to a more consistent application of disciplinary measures across the board. Additionally, the bill establishes specific requirements regarding records management, including the retention of medical records for a minimum duration.

Summary

Senate Bill 2115 focuses on the licensing and discipline of physicians and physician assistants in North Dakota. The bill introduces several amendments to existing laws and sets new requirements for the licensing process, including provisions for temporary suspensions in cases where a physician may pose a risk to public safety. It aims to enhance the regulatory framework governing medical practitioners, ensuring that those operating in the state meet established standards of competency and ethical conduct.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2115 appears to be largely supportive among healthcare professionals and regulatory bodies, which view the bill as a necessary evolution of medical oversight in North Dakota. However, concerns about the imposition of stricter regulations and the responsibilities placed on practicing physicians and physician assistants have also been raised. Proponents argue that enhanced regulation will lead to improved patient safety and care quality, while opponents may view it as burdensome, impacting the day-to-day operations of healthcare providers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's provisions for temporary license suspensions and the extent to which the North Dakota Board of Medicine may exercise its authority over licensees. Critics worry that the procedural changes may lead to potential overreach by the board and could disproportionately affect practitioners without fair due process. Opposition also stems from concerns regarding the administrative burdens placed on healthcare providers, particularly smaller practices, which might struggle to comply with enhanced regulatory requirements without additional support.