North Dakota Senate Bill SB2216

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Report Pass: 2/1/23
• Engrossed: 2/3/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report DNP: 3/14/23

Caption

The confidentiality of a law enforcement officer's contact information.

Impact

If enacted, SB2216 could significantly alter state laws regarding the privacy rights of law enforcement personnel. It would specifically create provisions that prevent the unauthorized disclosure of officers' personal information, essentially establishing a legal framework that prioritizes the safety and privacy of law enforcement professionals. This could lead to changes in how local and state agencies handle and protect sensitive information pertaining to their officers.

Summary

SB2216 addresses the confidentiality of law enforcement officers' contact information, aiming to protect their personal details from being disclosed publicly. The bill underscores the necessity for safeguarding the identities of those in law enforcement due to the risks they face from potential threats or violence stemming from their profession. The primary goal of this legislation is to enhance officers' safety and ensure that they can perform their duties without the fear of retaliation or exposure.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB2216 appears to lean towards support, particularly among law enforcement agencies and their advocates, who argue that the threats faced by officers necessitate stronger protective measures. However, there could be contrasting opinions from transparency advocates who may raise concerns about the implications of confidentiality measures on public accountability. The discussions suggest a divide between the need for officer protection and the public's right to access information about government employees.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB2216 involves the balance between protecting law enforcement officers’ safety and maintaining public transparency. Critics might argue that while the safety of officers is paramount, excessive confidentiality could hinder accountability and oversight, leading to potential abuses of power without adequate checks. This balancing act highlights the complexity of legislating privacy in the context of public service roles.