California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB357

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
6/27/23  
Refer
6/27/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Enrolled
8/22/24  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
8/22/24  
Enrolled
8/22/24  
Vetoed
9/28/24  

Caption

Vehicles: physician and surgeon reporting.

Impact

This legislation is expected to significantly impact the way medical information is shared with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). By enabling a discretionary reporting system until 2037, it provisions for the deletion of prior mandatory reporting requirements, which critics argue might reduce necessary oversight for potentially unsafe drivers. Furthermore, it aims to ensure that only relevant cases are reported, focusing on the public interest. Importantly, the bill includes protections against liability for health care providers who comply with these reporting requirements.

Summary

SB357, introduced by Senator Portantino, modifies reporting requirements for physicians regarding patients diagnosed with certain medical conditions that may impair their ability to operate a vehicle. Specifically, it allows physicians to report patients who are 15 years or older, or 14 years with a junior permit, diagnosed with conditions severe enough to impair driving. The bill aims to transition from a mandatory reporting framework to a discretionary one, affording physicians more flexibility while ensuring public safety on the roads.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB357 appears to be divided. Proponents support the transition to a discretionary reporting system, arguing that it respects patient confidentiality and medical judgment. They believe it protects patients from unnecessary DMV sanctions while maintaining crucial public safety measures. Conversely, skeptics express concern about the potential risks of fewer mandatory reports. They worry this may decrease the level of scrutiny on drivers with serious medical conditions that impair driving abilities, potentially leading to increased road safety hazards.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from differing views on public health safety versus individual privacy rights. The bill includes a requirement for the DMV to evaluate the system's impact by 2035, comparing the number of reports before and after the change. As the bill is set to revert to previous reporting practices by 2037 unless further action is taken, ongoing debates are likely about how such systems balance the interests of patient confidentiality against the necessity of reporting to ensure public safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1504

Public employment: retirement savings plans, employment conditions, and training.

CA SB1442

Point-of-care tests for fentanyl.

CA AB408

Physician Health and Wellness Program.

CA AB473

California Public Records Act.

CA AB2138

California Public Records Act.

CA AB1007

Forced or Involuntary Sterilization Compensation Program.

CA AB3052

Forced or Involuntary Sterilization Compensation Program.

CA AB1764

Forced or Involuntary Sterilization Compensation Program.