North Dakota Senate Bill SCR4012

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23
• Report DNP: 2/17/23

Caption

A concurrent resolution to rescind all extant applications by the North Dakota Legislative Assembly to call a convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, under Article V of the United States Constitution.

Impact

The adoption of SCR4012 could have broader implications for state laws and legislative behavior going forward. By rescinding previous applications for a constitutional convention, the bill effectively limits North Dakota's engagement in future constitutional reform initiatives at the national level. This decision reflects a conservative stance aimed at retaining the current structure of governance without the potential uncertainties that a constitutional convention could introduce. It aligns with a perspective that prioritizes maintaining established rights as defined in the Constitution.

Summary

SCR4012 is a concurrent resolution introduced in the North Dakota Legislative Assembly aimed at rescinding all current applications made by the state to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution. This resolution is enacted in the context of preserving the existing constitutional framework while cautioning against the risks associated with calling a convention that may lead to significant alterations to the Constitution. The resolution asserts that the existing Constitution is adequate for governing the nation without the need for further amendments through a convention and emphasizes the importance of an informed electorate in overseeing government actions.

Contention

During the discussions about SCR4012, various points of contention emerged regarding the necessity and appropriateness of further amendments to the Constitution via a convention. Proponents of SCR4012 argued that existing checks and balances within the federal structure are sufficient, and any drastic changes could potentially undermine the foundational rights enshrined in the current document. Opponents may counter these views by arguing that the application for a convention could offer a legitimate avenue for needed reforms; however, those advocating for SCR4012 emphasize caution against taking such steps that could lead to unforeseen consequences.