North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota House Bill HB1167

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Engrossed
2/20/25  
Refer
2/20/25  
Report Pass
3/14/25  
Enrolled
4/4/25  

Caption

Artificial intelligence disclosure statements.

Impact

This legislation directly impacts existing statutes related to political advertising by enforcing a standard for disclosure that is particularly relevant in the context of digital content creation. By requiring a disclaimer for AI-generated content, HB1167 promotes accountability and aims to curb misleading practices in political communications. As a result, it could reshape how political campaigns utilize technology and manage their advertising strategies, aligning them more closely with ethical standards and transparency expectations.

Summary

House Bill 1167 focuses on the use of artificial intelligence in political communications and mandates that any digital content generated, in whole or in part, by AI must include a clear disclaimer stating 'THIS CONTENT GENERATED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE'. This requirement is crucial, especially in an era where AI-generated content can mimic human voices and likenesses, which may lead to potential deception in political advertising and communications. The bill aims to enhance transparency about the origins of political content and seeks to inform the public about the nature of the information they are consuming.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB1167 appears to be largely positive, especially among those who advocate for honesty in political discourse and transparency in communication practices. The unanimous support in the House and Senate, with no votes against the bill, underscores a broad consensus among lawmakers on the importance of such disclosures. However, there may be underlying concerns from some technologists and creators about the implications this could have on creative expressions and the potential for intrusive regulations in the future.

Contention

While HB1167 enjoys broad bipartisan support, it may raise discussions around the scope and definitions used in the bill, particularly regarding what constitutes AI-generated content. Critics might argue that the specificity of the terms used could create loopholes or ambiguity in enforcement. Furthermore, the challenge will be in balancing the need for transparency with the practical challenges that comes with defining AI-generated works and ensuring compliance in a fast-evolving technological landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.