North Dakota House Bill HB1260

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Report Pass: 2/7/25
• Engrossed: 2/11/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Report Pass: 3/28/25
• Enrolled: 4/3/25
• Passed: 4/11/25

Caption

Nonresident deer bow licenses.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1260 is projected to have significant implications for nonresident hunters, potentially increasing their participation in the deer hunting season. It establishes a clearer framework for resource distribution, which may help in managing mule deer populations more effectively across the state. The amendment promotes inclusivity in hunting regulations while aligning with broader wildlife management goals intended to balance resident and nonresident hunting interests in North Dakota.

Summary

House Bill 1260 aims to amend North Dakota law regarding nonresident deer hunting by specifying that 15% of the total mule deer licenses and permits for the regular gun season must be allocated to nonresidents looking to hunt deer using a bow and arrow. This change is expected to enhance hunting opportunities for nonresidents while contributing to the management and conservation of wildlife in North Dakota. The bill seeks to revise existing statutory provisions in the North Dakota Century Code to reflect these new allocations for the upcoming hunting seasons.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1260 appears generally positive among the hunting community, particularly nonresident hunters, who view the bill as a positive step towards increased access to hunting opportunities. Supporters argue that this allocation fosters a fair hunting environment for nonresidents, contributing to local economies. However, there may be some apprehension among residents who feel that prioritizing nonresident licenses could impact their opportunities to hunt, leading to a mix of sentiments concerning local versus nonresident interests.

Contention

While HB 1260 has garnered widespread support, the allocation of hunting licenses between residents and nonresidents could be a point of contention. Some stakeholders may argue that prioritizing nonresident licenses could dilute opportunities for local hunters, as they may feel disadvantaged by having a portion of the licenses set aside. Balancing the interests of both resident and nonresident hunters will be crucial in the legislative discussions surrounding this bill.