North Dakota House Bill HB1387

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Report Pass: 1/29/25
• Engrossed: 2/4/25
• Refer: 2/13/25
• Report DNP: 4/2/25

Caption

School closures on election days if schools are used as polling places.

Impact

If enacted, HB1387 will amend existing statutes within the North Dakota Century Code concerning school operational days. It specifically reinforces the existing structure that allows for the closure of schools based on their function as polling places, thereby ensuring that educational settings are conducive to the electoral environment. Schools will need to adjust their calendars to accommodate these closures, which may have logistical implications for students, parents, and staff.

Summary

House Bill 1387 addresses the issue of school closures on election days when schools are designated as polling places. The bill mandates that schools must suspend classes on any day of a national, statewide, or local election if they are used as polling locations during regular school hours. This measure aims to prevent any potential interaction between students and voters, thereby prioritizing student safety and minimizing distractions during the electoral process.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB1387 has been generally positive, with support for the bill from various stakeholders who emphasize the importance of ensuring student safety during elections. The proposal is seen as a proactive step to safeguard students and maintain a clear demarcation between educational activities and the voting process, which some argue could be distracting or even chaotic.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, there may be points of contention regarding the implications of mandatory school closures. Critics might argue about the potential disruption to the educational calendar and the added burden it places on families who must manage child care during sudden school closures. Additionally, discussions may arise about the adequacy of current provisions and whether more flexible solutions could accommodate both student safety and community needs during elections.