North Dakota House Bill HB1475

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/25
• Refer: 1/17/25
• Report Pass: 2/10/25
• Refer: 2/10/25
• Report DNP: 2/21/25

Caption

Providing breakfast and lunch to all students of participating entities, including school districts, nonpublic schools, and tribal schools, at no cost to the student.

Impact

The bill is poised to impact state laws significantly by creating a new framework for school meal provision. The law mandates that participating entities must comply with existing federal nutrition guidelines, and it introduces a reimbursement mechanism that aligns with the federal free reimbursement rates. This will establish a standardized approach to meal provision and reimbursement, promoting participation in federal programs that support low-income families while ensuring that schools can provide essential meals without financial strain.

Summary

House Bill 1475 aims to ensure that all students enrolled in participating entities, which include public school districts, nonpublic schools, and tribal schools, receive breakfast and lunch at no cost. The bill recognizes the importance of adequate nutrition for students and seeks to alleviate financial barriers that may prevent some students from accessing these essential meals. By implementing this program, the bill clearly outlines that the superintendent of public instruction is responsible for providing reimbursement to the participating entities for the meals served, thereby facilitating a more equitable approach to student nutrition across North Dakota.

Contention

While there are likely supporters of HB 1475 who emphasize its potential to improve student health and educational outcomes by eliminating hunger, there may also be points of contention. Some stakeholders may raise concerns about the funding allocation for this initiative, with $140 million earmarked from the general fund for the biennium beginning July 1, 2025. Additionally, the compliance requirements for qualifying schools and the potential administrative burden placed on smaller or nonpublic schools could also be a topic of discussion, as they may require additional resources to meet the proposed guidelines.