A concurrent resolution urging the United States Supreme Court to restore the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman.
If passed, HCR3013 would not alter current state laws directly but would express a formal position from the state legislature rejecting the Supreme Court's interpretation of marriage. It aims to influence public discourse and potentially lay groundwork for legislative or judicial challenges to same-sex marriage rights at both the state and federal levels. The bill reflects a pushback against federal authority by asserting that matters of marriage should be legislated by individual states rather than mandated by the Supreme Court.
HCR3013 is a concurrent resolution passed by the North Dakota Legislative Assembly that urges the United States Supreme Court to overturn its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which established the right to same-sex marriage. The bill asserts that the ruling is in conflict with the original principles of liberty and the Constitution, arguing that marriage should be defined strictly as a union between one man and one woman. The resolution expresses concern that Obergefell v. Hodges presents a radical reinterpretation of rights that departs from historical and cultural precedents regarding marriage.
The resolution has sparked significant debate within North Dakota and potentially beyond, as it touches on deeply divisive issues surrounding marriage equality and states' rights. Supporters argue that it is vital to uphold traditional marriage definitions and claim that the Obergefell decision undermines state laws and voters' rights. Conversely, opponents contend that the resolution represents an attempt to erode established civil rights and could lead to discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. The discourse surrounding HCR3013 reflects broader national conversations about marriage, equality, and individual liberties.