North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Dakota Senate Bill SB2054

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  
Report Pass
1/10/25  
Engrossed
1/13/25  
Refer
2/13/25  

Caption

The master jury list; and to provide a contingent effective date.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws involves changes to how jury lists are created, potentially increasing the involvement of various demographic groups, including those receiving public assistance and individuals from federally recognized tribes. By formalizing the inclusion of tribal registries in the master list, the bill recognizes the importance of Indigenous populations in the judicial system. It also aims to allow greater access to jury lists for inspection, promoting accountability within the jury selection process.

Summary

Senate Bill 2054 aims to amend the North Dakota Century Code by revising the regulations concerning the master jury list. The bill proposes that each county clerk shall compile and maintain a master list that includes actual voters, public assistance recipients, and other residents, including names from tribal registries if provided. This amendment is intended to enhance the transparency of jury selection by ensuring that the master list is comprehensive and accessible to the public, thereby supporting the integrity of the legal process.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB2054 appears to be supportive among those who advocate for increased transparency and inclusivity within the judicial system. Proponents argue that a broader master jury list will help safeguard the fairness of jury trials and increase participation from underrepresented communities. However, some concerns may arise from individuals worried about privacy related to public assistance disclosures or potential bureaucratic complications arising from managing an expanded master list.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around SB2054 center on the inclusion of publicly available lists and the complexities involved in compiling such data. There may be debates regarding the adequacy of privacy protections for individuals receiving public assistance. Additionally, there could be apprehensions about how effectively county clerks will be able to manage the inclusion of diverse data sources without infringing on residents' rights or causing administrative burdens.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.