North Dakota Senate Bill SB2189

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/25
• Refer: 1/14/25
• Report DNP: 1/22/25

Caption

Reporting the value of prizes distributed by an organization using a permit to conduct raffles, bingo, sports pools, paddlewheels, twenty-one, and poker.

Impact

The bill has a significant impact on the regulation of non-profit gaming activities by requiring organizations to disclose their intended use of net income from these activities. Furthermore, permits must be issued by a governing body, which retains the authority to determine what constitutes a 'public-spirited organization.' The introduction of a fee of up to twenty-five dollars for permit applications could affect the financial capabilities of small organizations looking to engage in these activities.

Summary

Senate Bill 2189 seeks to amend existing laws regarding the reporting of prize values distributed by organizations that conduct various gaming activities, including raffles and bingo, under a permit system. The legislation outlines the eligibility of organizations to apply for permits and establishes specific monetary limits on prizes that can be awarded. For instance, the primary prize awarded cannot exceed eight thousand dollars, and total prizes across all games are capped at forty thousand dollars annually, thereby regulating the financial aspects of the gaming activities permitted within North Dakota.

Conclusion

Overall, SB2189 aims to bring more structure and accountability to the gaming activities permitted under state law. While it seeks to regulate and standardize these activities to promote transparency and responsible gaming, concerns regarding limitations and administrative burdens may influence the bill's acceptance by various organizations within the state.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB2189 include the regulatory framework it establishes for gaming activities and the discretion afforded to local governing bodies. Some stakeholders may argue that the financial caps on prizes could inhibit the ability of organizations to attract participants by offering competitive prizes. Moreover, the requirement for detailed reporting to the attorney general may be viewed as burdensome by smaller organizations, potentially discouraging their participation in legitimate gaming activities.