North Dakota Senate Bill SB2198

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/25
• Refer: 1/14/25
• Report Pass: 1/24/25
• Engrossed: 1/28/25
• Refer: 2/18/25
• Report Pass: 3/21/25
• Enrolled: 4/15/25
• Passed: 4/18/25

Caption

National guard or federal service leave of absence for state and political subdivision employees and the definition of veteran; and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The proposed changes will impact state laws by clarifying the definition of a veteran and enhancing leave protections for employees undergoing military service. This redefinition includes individuals who have served a minimum duration on active duty and establishes certain rights for them while maintaining their employment status. By offering up to twenty workdays of paid leave for qualifying employees, the legislation emphasizes the state’s commitment to supporting veterans and active service members in the workforce, potentially setting a precedent for similar legislation.

Summary

Senate Bill 2198 seeks to amend North Dakota law regarding the definition of a veteran and provisions for state and political subdivision employees who are members of the national guard or reserves and called into federal service. The bill aims to assure that these individuals retain their employment status and receive specific leave benefits while serving. Employees are entitled to a period of leave without loss of pay for active service or military duty, provided they meet certain criteria, including continuous employment before their leave.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 2198 appears positive, with unanimous support reflected in the voting outcome of 46-0 in the Senate. The bill is viewed as an acknowledgment of the service and sacrifices made by members of the military and national guard, resonating well with legislators across party lines. There is strong agreement on the need for provisions that protect employees who serve, highlighting a shared commitment to veteran welfare in North Dakota.

Contention

While the bill enjoyed strong support, some concerns might arise related to its implementation and any potential implications for state agencies in managing military leave. Specific provisions regarding the definition of a veteran could require additional clarification to ensure equitable application. Moreover, ensuring that local municipalities align with state regulations without overshadowing local employment policies might present challenges, especially in diverse work environments across the state.