North Dakota Senate Bill SB2245

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/25
• Refer: 1/17/25
• Report Pass: 2/6/25
• Engrossed: 2/10/25
• Refer: 2/18/25
• Report Pass: 4/3/25
• Enrolled: 4/14/25
• Passed: 4/17/25

Caption

The use of blinds, boats, and decoys in taking ducks and geese.

Impact

The impact of SB 2245 on state laws is significant as it aims to enhance the clarity of hunting regulations in North Dakota. By specifically detailing the circumstances under which different types of hunting aids can be used, the bill seeks to align state law with contemporary hunting practices while ensuring compliance with safety standards. If passed, it may lead to a more consistent approach to waterfowl hunting across the state, thereby benefiting both hunters and wildlife management efforts.

Summary

Senate Bill 2245 proposes amendments to section 20.1-04-11 of the North Dakota Century Code, focusing on the legal use of blinds, boats, and decoys for hunting ducks and geese. The bill explicitly states the permissible methods for waterfowl hunting, particularly emphasizing restrictions on the use of motorized boats while hunting and detailing when and how artificial decoys can be utilized. The intent behind the bill is to clarify existing regulations to promote safe and responsible hunting practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2245 is generally positive within the hunting community, with many supporters appreciating the refinement of existing laws that could potentially reduce confusion. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the implementation of new restrictions, particularly regarding the use of boats during hunting, which could affect hunting efficiency for some individuals. Overall, the bill is seen as a step towards responsible wildlife conservation.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the new stipulations concerning the use of motorized boats and the provisions that authorize the use of artificial decoys. Some argue that the proposed regulations might restrict traditional hunting practices and could impose unnecessary limitations on hunters. Additionally, the bill's measures to define regulations may require further discussion to ensure balance between conservation efforts and the rights and needs of local hunters.