The enactment of HB 1073 will significantly change the government's approach to attorney-related records, potentially increasing access to information that was previously protected. This shift could lead to greater governmental accountability, as the public would have more means to monitor legal interactions and decisions made within state government. With more records being classified as accessible rather than exempt, the bill is expected to enhance public trust in governmental operations.
Summary
House Bill 1073 aims to modify the exemptions for attorney-related records from the New Hampshire right to know law, specifically RSA 91-A. This legislation seeks to narrow the scope of what constitutes exempt records under the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. By doing so, the bill emphasizes a commitment to transparency and public access to governmental records, reducing the limitations that currently shield certain legal documents from public scrutiny.
Contention
Despite its intention to foster transparency, there are concerns among legal professionals about the implications of narrowing the exemptions provided by the existing law. Critics argue that this could jeopardize the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship, thereby affecting the willingness of individuals and entities to seek legal counsel. Additionally, there are fears that unintentional disclosures could arise, leading to sensitive information being exposed, which could impede the effectiveness of legal representation in certain cases.