If enacted, HB 1362 would amend existing statutes regarding the powers of the governor and the organization of the state's military forces. It establishes a clearer precedent for the maintenance of a state guard and ensures that there is a contingency plan in place for the mobilization of this force during critical situations. The requirement for the adjutant general to maintain a roster of available personnel adds a layer of preparedness that could enhance the state’s overall emergency response capabilities. This legislation would likely position the state guard as an integral component of New Hampshire's defense and emergency management strategy.
Summary
House Bill 1362 aims to formalize the establishment and maintenance of a state guard in New Hampshire. The bill compels the governor to maintain a state guard force whenever any part of the New Hampshire national guard is active in the service of the United States. This move is aimed at ensuring that the state has a dedicated military force ready to respond to various emergencies, including invasion, rebellion, disaster, insurrection, and other forms of civil unrest. The governor, under the provisions of the bill, is also required to ensure that a roster of active personnel is maintained by the adjutant general, which depicts an organizational framework for the state guard’s operation.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1362 is generally supportive among legislators and military advocates who see the necessity of having a structured state guard as a safeguard for the community. Proponents argue that this bill enhances public safety and ensures that the state can quickly mobilize its resources in the face of emergencies. Critics, however, have cautioned about potential misuse or overreach of authority by state executive powers, urging for clear regulations and guidelines to govern the state guard's operations. The discussion highlights a balance between maintaining security and respecting civil liberties.
Contention
Notable points of contention in the legislative discussions may revolve around concerns of governance and the appropriate scope of military power at the state level. While supporters of the bill assert the importance of having a state guard to fill in during national guard mobilizations, some legislators might fear that this could lead to an excessive concentration of power in the hands of the governor. Such debates could bring into question priorities in state spending, the availability of trained personnel, and the implications of a standing military force on civil rights.
Relating to the organization, powers, and authority of the Texas State Guard, including the powers and authority of the adjutant general and governor relating to the Texas State Guard.
Relative to extending hiring preferences for military members and their spouses to the state and private businesses, and establishing purchase preferences for disabled veterans and military spouses regarding state supply purchases.
Relative to positions within the department of military affairs and veterans services, making an appropriation to the state regenerative manufacturing workforce development fund, and adjusting and making an appropriation relative to the medicaid reimbursement rates for ambulance services.
Relative to the New Hampshire National Guard recruitment and reenlistment incentive program, and continuing a recruitment and retention incentive program and efforts within the department of transportation.