New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB1431

Introduced
12/1/21  
Refer
12/1/21  
Report Pass
3/9/22  
Report DNP
3/9/22  
Engrossed
3/22/22  
Refer
3/22/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  

Caption

Establishing the parental bill of rights.

Impact

The bill significantly alters the existing framework of parental rights by codifying the concept of a parental bill of rights into law. Under HB 1431, if any rights are violated, parents have the legal standing to seek declaratory relief, injunctions, and monetary damages against the state or relevant political subdivisions, increasing accountability in education. The potential increase in civil petitions and legal complaints could lead to a backlog in the judicial system, as parents seek remedies for perceived violations of their rights.

Summary

House Bill 1431, known as the Parental Bill of Rights, establishes a framework that enables parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their minor children. The bill asserts that parents have fundamental rights regarding their children's education and well-being, emphasizing that important information pertaining to a minor should not be withheld from parents. This legal framework mandates schools and government entities to provide timely notifications to parents about significant actions affecting their children, fostering transparency in educational settings.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1431 is divided among parties and stakeholders. Proponents argue that it enhances parental control and shields parents from governmental overreach, thereby reinforcing family autonomy. Critics express concerns that the bill could lead to conflicts between parental rights and the rights of children, particularly regarding sensitive educational content. The polarized discourse indicates a broader societal debate on the balance between parental influence and children's autonomy in education.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding the bill, particularly regarding how it might affect existing school policies and regulations. Opponents fear that it could hinder the ability of educators and school authorities to effectively manage student behavior and welfare, as it may discourage necessary disclosures about students' welfare. Furthermore, the definition of what constitutes a violation is somewhat vague, which may lead to disputes and varied interpretations in practice, creating tension between educational practices and parental authority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB645

School finance: administrative employees to teacher ratio.

CA AB1577

California Safe Drinking Water Act: Sativa-Los Angeles County Water District.

NJ A1524

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

NJ S1751

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

NJ S2121

Requires adoption of anti-nepotism policies by school districts and charter schools.

MS SB2807

West Bolivar Consolidated School District; deconsolidate to form the West Bolivar, Shaw and Benoit School Districts.

NH HB564

Relative to the adoption of school administrative unit budgets.

TX SB2384

Relating to the creation of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Regional Administrative Judicial Districts, the creation of the office of regional district attorney for each district, and the powers and duties of regional district attorneys.