New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB1452

Introduced
12/1/21  

Caption

Renaming the department of environmental services the department of environmental protection and assigning the department oversight of private drinking water wells.

Impact

The legislation implies significant shifts in state laws governing water safety and environmental protection. By empowering the newly named Department of Environmental Protection to conduct inspections and sample private wells, the bill promotes a proactive approach to safeguarding drinking water. While the bill itself does not impose new regulations, it establishes a more structured oversight protocol intended to protect residents who rely on private wells for their water supply. On an operational level, the name change also signifies a potential rebranding of the department's mission toward stronger environmental advocacy.

Summary

House Bill 1452 aims to rename the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services to the Department of Environmental Protection and enhance the department's authority regarding private drinking water wells. This bill proposes vital changes in oversight, allowing the department to enter private properties to inspect water wells and take samples for compliance with existing laws. Such provisions seek to ensure that drinking water quality is consistently monitored and controlled under a centralized regulatory framework, thereby enhancing public health and safety.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1452 appears primarily positive, with support from various environmental and public health advocates who emphasize the importance of ensuring safe drinking water. While the bill may face minimal opposition, concerns could arise regarding property rights and the extent of government oversight. However, proponents argue that the benefits of consumer protection vastly outweigh such apprehensions. The strong public health focus in the bill reflects growing awareness of environmental issues and a push for government accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding property owner rights and the potential overreach of state authority into private lands. Some individuals may view the mandate for the Department of Environmental Protection to inspect private wells as an infringement on personal property rights. The balance between ensuring public health and respecting individual rights will likely be a key topic during discussions and legislative sessions surrounding the bill. Moreover, critics may argue that the resources required for such oversight could divert funding from other critical environmental initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB680

Well stimulation.

CA SB1272

California Environmental Quality Act: program environmental impact report: clean energy infrastructure projects.

MN HF5011

Wetland Conservation Act determinations efficiency improved, environmental and resource management permit application process improved, Pollution Control Agency required to issue separate permits for construction and operation of certain facilities, other provisions related to environmental review and licensing modified, and money appropriated.

MN SF4876

Environmental provisions modifications and appropriations

CA SB44

California Environmental Quality Act: streamlined judicial review: environmental leadership transit projects.

CA AB1486

California Environmental Quality Act: housing.

CA AB2211

California Green Business Program.

CA AB914

Electrical infrastructure: California Environmental Quality Act: review time period.